Tag: RWS

  • A E Waite | Happy Birthday!

    A E Waite | Happy Birthday!

    On this day, 163 years ago, in Brooklyn Arthur Edward Waite entered the world. For the first time? Who knows!

    His father died when he was very young, so his mother returned to her homeland, England, taking the young Arthur with her.

    It was the death of his sister in 1874 that triggered what would become a life-long interest in the occult and he soon found his way to the esoteric sections of the British Library. And aren’t we grateful that he did?!

    I was today years old when I found out that for the nine years prior to the Rider Waite Smith Tarot being released into the world, Waite worked for Horlicks!

    He joined the ranks of The Golden Dawn in 1891. This esoteric group was popular with creatives in the 1890s and unfortunately, there were a lot of very large personalities in its membership (including Aleister Crowley) and it pulled itself apart (put itself back together and pulled itself apart again!)

    It was 1909 when he hit the big time (in the Tarot world!) when the tarot deck he’d designed along with fellow Golden Dawn member Pamela Colman Smith was published by Rider. Initially known as the Rider Waite Tarot, over more recent years the enormous contribution of Pixie Smith has been better recognised and it is more often referred to as the Rider Waite Smith Tarot.

    It is the best-selling Tarot deck in the world – ranked no 1 for Cartomancy and New Age Mysicism and no 2 for Tarot, today on Amazon. Not bad going for a deck that is well over 100 years old!

    Tonight I’ll have a Horlicks in your honour, Arthur!

  • Pamela Colman Smith | Family History

    Pamela Colman Smith | Family History

    This idea that PCS was bi-racial does the rounds from time to time and it’s something I’ve always wondered about myself. Time to do a spot of detective work on the ol’ intertubes.

    What do we know? From Pamela Colman-Smith’s wiki page, we think that her mother was from Jamaica and her father was an American. The idea that Pixie was bi-racial seems to stem from her mother’s side of the family and that Jamaica connection. But, what’s the evidence?

    Her mother was a Colman and her father was a Smith. Let’s break it back from there. Let’s look at the grand parents first.

    Pixie’s grandfather – Cyrus Porter Smith

    Cyrus P Smith was Mayor of Brooklyn for two years and went on to become a senator. When he died, the New York Times described him as ‘one of Brooklyn’s most prominent and respected citizens’.

    He had seven children, one of whom was Charles Edward Smith, who became Pixie’s father. Here he is in all his glory.

    Charles Edward Smith – Pixie’s father
    from this tripod site

    This is a sketch of Pixie’s maternal grandmother, Pamela Chandler Colman from the frontispiece of a book that she wrote for her daughter, Corinne. Corinne went on to become Pixie’s mother.

    Corinne Colman had a famous brother, the water-colourist Samuel Colman. And here HE is in all his glory too.

    Samuel Colman

    The sepia photograph above shows Corrine’s younger sister celebrating her 50th wedding anniversary.

    From this entry in Wiki tree for the birth and death details of Corrine Colman (Smith), it looks as though Corrine was born in Boston, not Jamaica. Note that the publishers of the book are Colman of Boston.

    It does seem that Pixie’s mother died in St Andrews, Jamaica in 1896.

    This sketch shows Corrine Colman as a child, the mother of Pamela Colman Smith, again from a sketch in a book that her mother wrote for her.

    The maternal side of the family tree (Colman, and further back to Chandler) has been traced back to the earliest settlers in the US HERE. in this fabulous ancestry database.

    All the imagery leads me to conclude that although Pixie had strong links to Jamaica in her early life when her parents moved the family to Kingston in 1889 (because of her father’s job with the West India Improvement Company) and that her mother died there in 1896, her mother’s family were not FROM Jamaica, but instead from Massachusetts/New Hampshire, specifically Boston and Maine.

  • 2020 Tarot Court Card | Attention to Detail Required

    2020 Tarot Court Card | Attention to Detail Required

    This guy. THIS GUY!

    If you have worked out your Court Card for 2020, you will hopefully be factoring in their guidance for the coming year.

    I like to look at them as attitudes that can affect your every interaction – if you let them. (See tomorrow’s blog post!)

    I patiently worked out that my 2020 companion in arms would be Court Card No 7 and promptly checked my ready reckoner of court card number allocations and tooted to all and sundry that my main man for 2020 was going to be the Knight of Wands.

    Knight of Wands Alexander Daniloff
    Not, in fact, THIS GUY.

    Reader, I got myself a THEME TUNE, some words to live by and was very much looking forward to roaring into 2020 with my fiery companion.

    Except I was wrong. Head-the-desk-stoopid wrong.

    My companion is, as was gently pointed out to me by a much more reasonable head than my own on instagram, the Knight of Swords. For it is HE who is No 7.

    I double-checked. Which is crazy because I quadruple-checked the first time. And yet I’d still read the information wrongly.

    Far too much hash-bash-let-me-at-em Knight of Wands energy and not enough cerebral Swords energy.

    And YET, now that I see him, he is indeed the perfect energy that I will need for 2020. Heck, even this morning I shared info about Northumberland Humane Society thinking that it was Northumberland in the UK, when it was actually Northumberland in CANADA.

    Yeah, Swords energy is going to be very, very important this year.

    So, my dear friends, for all of you who have ended up confused AF as to how Court Card 7 can be the Knight of Wands when the eyes in your head are showing you that Court Card 7 is the Knight of Swords …. I am truly sorry. Also – I like to keep you on your toes 😀

    Proof, if proof were needed, that I don’t so much as have feet of clay, as boots of concrete when it comes to Tarot Court cards.

    On the upside, it shows that it works – I’m in much more need of the Knight of Swords than the Knight of Wands – witness the cock-ups that I am making a scant 3 days into the year.

    And with that, I shall now edit my own 2020 info in the other posts to make better sense.

    Apologies!

  • Comparative Tarot | Page of Wands

    We began this Comparative Tarot session with a look at the Page of Swords, over three decks.  Today we look at the Page of Wands, trying to find common ground and extend our perceptions as to what he might mean in the decks that we use ourselves.

    On the left we have the RWS Page of Wands, then the Fante Di Bastone from the Tarot of The Master (ToTM), the Knave of Batons from Dame Fortune’s Tarot Wheel and finally the Page of Staffs from The Byzantine Tarot.

    In the RWS we have a cloaked-up young man standing in an arid landscape.  He must be roasting hot in his hat and cloak! He gazes intently at his sprouting Wand.  Pyramids line the horizon to the right of the card.


    The Fante stands dressed in his travelling clothes, his Wand held like a walking stick, his cloak pulled around him and his little dog companion on a leash behind him.

    The Knave of Batons is named Hector in the Dame Fortune deck.  He looks martial with his helmet, breast plate and shin protectors. Yet he has no sword or shield. He too stands in a landscape, focussed on the Wand.

    The Byzantine Page is out of his office and hurries over the grass, bearing scrolls in his hands.

    We know that Pages stand for smallness, messages and newness …  but what do the Pages creators say about them?

    In A E Waite’s ‘Pictorial Key To The Tarot’ he writes of the Page of Wands:  “Dark young man, faithful, a lover, an envoy, a postman….He may signify family intelligence”.  Clearly missing in the Donald Trump family, I think.

    The ToTM Fante is marked with the keyword ‘Message’ and the Little White Book (LWB) that accompanies the deck adds little to what we can see, stating only that the rural aspect of the Wands is clearly seen in the Fante.

    Hector’s LWB entry states: “A stranger.  Hector, prince of Troy. An unknown person, something extraordinary, admirable.  A messenger for a powerful man.”

    The Byzantine’s Page information comes from a good-sized accompanying book that comes with the deck.  The key words are: “A Prodigy, A Stranger, an Emissary, Surprise, Naivety, Faithfulness, Tidings – good and bad”.

    The common elements seem to be faithfulness, foreignness and a messenger of some sort (either delivery or ambassadorial)

    How can we link all this together?

    The RWS Page is clearly wearing the wrong clothes for his environment, so he’s HERE from somewhere else? And if you are visiting, you are a stranger and a foreigner … and you could be acting on someone’s behalf or delivering a message?

    The Fante is dressed for travel, with his cloak slung around his shoulders and his sturdy boots on.  Again – travel, foreignness … maybe he is waiting for the letter he must deliver.  We also clearly see this idea of faithfulness in the shape of his dog.  Dogs are often associated with fidelity.

    Hector was, according to Homer a thoughtful, heroic chap – so we can see the ‘admirable’ qualities that his LWB talks about.  Interestingly, on Wiki I read that author James Redfield describes him as a ‘martyr to loyalties..’ Also, according to Wiki, his name, Hector could mean ‘hold fast’ so here we have two ways that he is associated with loyalty and fidelity.

    Although I don’t think he was noted for being a messenger (please let me know if this is a wrong assumption on my part!) he is dressed in armour, but not in a battle. So, like the RWS he is here from somewhere else – so a foreigner and stranger 🙂

    The Byzantine Page of Staffs is clearly delivering messages.  More usually found in the confines of the office, this Page is outside his usual enviroment, just as much as the RWS Page and Hector – so again we can infer foreignness and being a stranger.

    So there we have it – by looking at four Pages of Wands we can see that they are messengers, strangers abroad, faithful and admirable.

    How do YOU interpret the Page of Wands?

    Like the look of these cards? ….

    Amazon.co.uk Widgets

  • Boston

    So, there I was last night, plinky-plonking away on the ipad’s tiny keyboard with my eyes smarting from squinting in the darkness when I noticed that the TV seemed to be showing rather a lot of footage of people from Boston.  I was working with the sound turned down.  Why I didn’t just turn the damned telly off, I don’t know. I like the company.  Even if it is Jeremy Paxman.  I turned the sound up and the full horror seeped through the screen and into my living room.

    How strange to be working away diligently on a blog post about the history of Tarot cards when some person (I use that term very loosely) was blowing up a whole crowd of cheering, happy people who were simply raising funds for charity.

    Who would do such a thing?  The media speculation begins.  So I decided to speculate myself.  I reached for my RWS deck, shuffled and drew a card: 8 Cups.

    This is my take:  Whomever is behind the bombing seems to be someone who is disenchanted with how life is for them – those cups are artfully arranged to look like there is one missing.  But, of course, there ISN’T one missing (otherwise it would be the 9 of Cups!).

    Lots of people would be happy with 8 golden Cups, but not this person.  They have turned their back on their (comfortable? happy-looking?) life and headed off to seek for truth.  But what truth are they finding?  There’s no objective truth in an ideology – whatever ideology it might be.  Heck, sometimes it’s hard to find a definitive truth about ANYTHING – the sky isn’t blue, mountains aren’t solid, there are sounds and colours that are beyond our capacity to experience, Justin Bieber isn’t that good a singer.

    Does the red cloak have any significance here, for this question? Matadors have red cloaks.  Men who goad bulls to anger and violence? Little Red Riding Hood had a red cloak. She outwitted a big bad wolf.

    Maybe the only difference between a terrorist (a matador) and a freedom fighter (Little Red Riding Hood) is where you find yourself when he acts out his ideology?

    My second question was direct – Foreign or Domestic?

    The card drawn is the Queen of Pentacles.  She sits in a lush setting and is well-dressed – someone who is not short of a dollar or two.

    The Queen is not a character that you would associate with any kind of violence.  But Pentacles IS the suit of home and hearth.  Does this signify a home-grown terrorist?  Or does it just mean that the bomber is someone who feels that their hearth and home needs defended against ‘American Imperialism’?

    Or is it simply to do with money? She’s totally focussed on that Pentacle….

    How would you interpret these two cards for my questions? And have you drawn cards about this horrific act to see what the cards have to say?

    All thoughts are with the people of Boston.

  • 30 Day Tarot Challenge | Day 3

    Question 3 in the Tarot Challenge:


    Do you have more than one deck that you use, and, if so, do you have a favorite? If not, why do you like the deck you have chosen?


    I think that most Tarotists develop the compulsion to add to their deck collections!  Sometimes it is just the amazing art that attracts you to a deck, sometimes it’s a system or mythology that you love to work with.  Sometimes it’s just the thrill of the new.  Yes, I am a Tarotholic.  I am only about 4 days ‘clean’ and not anticipating to run to many more.  I love, love, new decks!


    I do have a favourite.  Actually, a couple of favourites.


    My comfy-slippers deck is the Rider Waite Smith – either the Original or the Centenary Edition.  Yes, they’re pretty much identical, but the Queen of Swords looks a lot less po-faced in the Centenary Edition, I think!


    I have loved the DruidCraft Tarot since I first laid eyes on it and I can honestly say that I use it every single day.  I love the ethos behind it.  I love the art of Will Worthington beyond words.  


    I am his biggest fan.  *said in same tone of voice as Kathy Bates in Stephen King’s Misery* 😀


    I’ve used The Druidcraft in lots of posts on this blog – too numerous to list!


    My newest love is Alexander Daniloff’s Tarot which I love TO DEATH.  It’s one of those decks that just sings out to me – the colour, the style of the artwork, the humorous touches.  Right up my Tarot street! I’ve already written about his Court Cards – you can check them out here


    I’m also a teeny bit in love with the Lenormand Revolution Oracle by Roz Foster and Carrie Paris.  Again, I am absolutely loving Roz Foster’s artwork across the cards.  The overall effect is a consistent, clean and damned attractive deck.  Now all I need to do is learn how to read with it!


    A good Tarot deck is, for me, something that has plenty of symbolism in it to get the ol’ juices flowing as far as intuition goes.  


    I’m increasingly drawn to old decks – perhaps I’m searching for interpretations, lost over the years and hundreds of decks that have now been published.


    So – why don’t you tell me what YOUR favourite Tarot deck is – give me a link to it.  Help me feed my addiction 😀

  • The Courts on Valentine’s Day

    Yeah, so it’s a commercially-driven marketing man’s dream and has no direct relation to the poor Saint who was kebabed with arrows.

    And no, I didn’t get one.

    Our Tarot courts are made up of lots of characters with distinct personalities and today is a good day for looking at how the various court members relate to each other.

    Take out your court cards and lay them down in random pairings and just look at how they physically relate to each other….. forget what you KNOW and just look at The Body Language 😉

    If the King and Queen of the same suit are facing each other – does it mean they are devoted to each other, or so wrapped up in their relationship they are neglecting other important matters.  What if she’s looking out at YOU and he’s looking at HER?  Has she got a wandering eye?!

    What happens if you swap them around? She’s still looking at you, but is he turning a blind eye?!

    If they are facing away from each other – does this mean that they don’t see eye to eye or are they confident enough in each other that they can pursue their own interests without worrying about each other?  Or are they each wrapped up in their own interests at the expense of their relationships?

    In mixed suit pairings – are there Kings and Queens who look happier together than with their allocated suit partner?!

    What about a Queen and a Knight? If she is looking at the Knight of another suit, does it mean that she’s got designs on a younger, more exciting man? If it’s her own Knight – could she be a helicopter mother?!

    Kings and Knights – if they are looking in the same direction – is the King wishing he could recapture his own Knightly qualities?  Looking towards each other – an alliance between a senior and a junior?

    What about the Pages – do Pages that stand back to back dislike each other? Not understand each other?

    What might the various cards’ gestures mean to the card you have paired it with?

    Done them all?  Shuffle and do it again!!!

    This little exercise can take ages – does it yield any additional insights for you with your court personalities?

    Deck:  Rider Waite Smith.  Copyright US Games.  Artwork Pamela Colman-Smith.