Recently I've
been seeing a few tweets and fb posts about gender and ethnicity in
the tarot and how we can ensure that the entire spectrums of both are
represented. People, perfectly reasonably, want to see themselves reflected in the tool
that they work with on a daily basis.
Since my own
Tarot specialism is the court card arcana, I am especially interested
in how these issues might be best resolved in the courts.
From what I can see, we have three issues:
- the
gender split in the ranks
- the order of the genders in the ranks
- the appearance of characters on the cards.
Looking at the
deck ranks, we generally have Page, Knight, Queen and King. Knights
and Kings are regarded as masculine while Queens are regarded as
feminine. Pages tend to be the one rank where there is a bit of
leeway and youthful males and females abound.
If pressed, I'd
say that Pages and Queens represent a Yin energy whereas
the Knights and Kings are more Yang. If that's the case, then we
have titles that are 50:50 with regard to the sexes associated with
those rank titles.
There are
increasing numbers of decks that switch things around a bit. Some
have gods and goddesses (with the goddesses allocated the most Kingly rank, thank you very much). Others have titles that bear no
relation to the sex of the incumbent nor give a clue as to any order of 'importance' rank - Teacher, Adventurer, Postulant
etc.
So we ARE
breaking out of the traditional mould and most people should be able
to find a deck where the court ranks are more appealing than Page to
King.
Another issue
that can arise with the ranks is the eroneous assumption that the
King is the 'top' or most desirable rank. Just because the King card
is the final card in the series, don't make the mistake of thinking
that it's the most important card or the most desirable 'character'
in the court series.
Far from it.
King energy is
great when you have got to walk the talk, but if you are learning a
new skill, the Page's energy will serve you so much better than a King's energy.
Similarly, a teacher would aspire to the Queen energy and a medical
or software pioneer (for example) may hold the Knight energy to be
their most prized court.
No one rank is
more important than the others.
We are a
multi-hued and sexually fluid bunch these days and we do not want to
limit ourselves to the gender- or monochrome cul-de-sac that is
depicted in most tarot decks (especially old ones).
As far as the
appearances of the various characters in the decks, yes, we do have
gazillions of Caucasian or European-looking characters. This is not
surprising, given the European history of the Tarot deck. However, at
the beginning of the 21st century, we could benefit from more decks
casting their nets wider as far as appearance and gender goes. If
someone wants to use a Tarot deck because all the characters are
African American.... or red-haired .... or all male or all female
.... that's absolutely fine. We all want to feel that we are part of
the picture, and it would be great if there was a gorgeous deck for
everyone!
But
here's the thing. For
ME, neither the sex of the characters on the cards, nor the sex
associated with the rank, nor the ethnicity of the characters on the
cards has any bearing on how I read those cards.
For example -
The Page of Cups indicates a type of PERSON who may be tentatively
embarking (Page energy) a new relationship (Cups energy). This could
be a guy, could be a girl, could be a Caucasian person, could be an
Asian person, could be red-headed, could be a blonde... could be a 6'
transexual from Bolton who calls herself Alan during the week and
Tania at the weekends.
If people fall
into the trap of thinking that Kings = men, and Queens = women, they
are doing their sitter (and themselves) a disservice.
For me, ALL the
ranks apply as equally to women as they do to men. And to men who
have transitioned to women. And to women who have transitioned to
men. And every sexual stripe and shade of humanity in between.
Court cards are
about types of energy and not about sex, gender or colour.
What of the thorny problem of selecting a court card when choosing a significator?
Traditionally,
certain courts have depicted specific 'looks' when choosing a card to
represent your sitter. These Golden Dawn inspired 'looks' don't work in today's multicultural society - they are too restrictive.
Likewise
choosing a significator based on someone's perceived sex could easily cause offence. You don't want your reader/client relationship hitting an
early bump in the road by making an error in your assumptions, nor by bluntly asking someone how they want to be
identified.
Forget choosing a significator with any kind of gender
or ethnicity requirement. Instead
consider selecting one based on your sitter's sun sign. Everybody knows their date of birth. Thus, any
Cancer-born person would be represented by the Queen of Cups. Simple.
OR you could
just let your sitter pick one of the 16 cards by themselves - then
you don't have to worry and they don't need to discuss such an
intimate detail about themselves with you. And you, as a reader, can talk with your sitter about the sort of energy associated with that court card too.
OR you might be
sitting reading this in a daze thinking - who the hell still bothers with a significator
these days?!
What do you think - find new titles for the 21st century? Expand the genders? Switch up how the courts look?
Just a bit of Tarot Court Card fun to start us thinking about what we want for ourselves in 2018. I've done this for the past couple of years and it's just a bit of fun, not rooted in any deep and meaningful ancient system. Just my own :) 
